IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 24 July 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6F93A0C8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QzfTzyw0CLMZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F163A0C48 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OFMoci013588; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:24:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=u5m5n71q69DQ3vZu6Kr4NmZ/V0JYrJNzT0mvZ2roWcc=; b=OQJ9Imwt9e4UtdILJDBF+e9YxM1b0frPcQyjowtDRZYKB+ZGsBthrZ9YT1HHBkCqJgsv ygsXn6/zYxf11WSJ1i3KN5M0zOvvTBhsMqb8ZS2YdrZo1Rdi/OMz6is0GJg1/+wOblAe gXfmd5SVmdwbga10EdY3i2SHz7fcZ6qy64iBMP8llVppWFYP3IwVWmnL1Axi+tn8TwYk XzAia6Qg2WMdjqek7oRjdevJi+zxXjFsWN358nBCZuSBurqbTVg52pqJZvI11MUDrIOD F7VmQVH2TUaqzhV1IPtdq14Ez98p2j2GdN22B/4oPSk50jptAeL6cArvewWnn8n1JLHv bA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32bs7j5c5x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:24:12 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06OFH48d005800; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:24:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32dmj2p8gn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:24:11 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:24:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:24:11 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Topic: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Index: AQHWYQ9qtd6kdf2qrEa/XteDIWlbrqkWJ04AgAD0BYD//7+DAA==
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:24:10 +0000
Message-ID: <A0CE866D-575C-4A32-B009-F26447C11013@akamai.com>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <E00B0B8E-434A-486D-AB0D-8BE12ECE30BD@mnot.net> <20200724151459.GD10435@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200724151459.GD10435@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EBB8335DEAC1C441BCE4ED8518411BEC@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-24_05:2020-07-24, 2020-07-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=614 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240118
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-24_05:2020-07-24, 2020-07-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=575 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007240120
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jYp8HP_-U-9UBMofYzJNfe1mYBU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:24:29 -0000

>    and 20 years from now we're sitting on exactly the same mail thread and argue
    about replacing min and sec.

That's fine.  Language evolves.  As do standards.  Nobody will ever need more than 640Kb.  Nobody will ever need more than 32bits of IP address.  Why should a document be different?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email