IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 24 July 2020 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931753A0998 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxZZMemElJMY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E817F3A0A26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 58699 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2020 14:01:44 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 24 Jul 2020 14:01:44 -0000
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <933ce8b4-78a5-76bf-55c3-7c5694faffbb@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <24325775-740E-469F-98C0-E9C8F8B9F169@akamai.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <bc7197ab-78fd-bb86-6593-6ab948f5c5d3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:19:43 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24325775-740E-469F-98C0-E9C8F8B9F169@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/slHMhKZmMREnFR28YB2ErFLqpjI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:20:08 -0000

Salz, Rich wrote:

 > Yes, it is probably a US-dominated view of things

And, I feel offended if US people insist on distorting the
meaning of "slave" only mean black slaves ignoring sad history
of enslavement of yellows (and whites).

> The IETF was US-dominated

It was but isn't.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email