Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C943E3A0A03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bw4J8Wri8co3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293123A0B27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFqQ40YZLz1nw7H; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1595877612; bh=JlOehu4DCkjPPtrykWVX97jK9qr2IfAWoK3mf9dydU8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=H92N9pRTKh7CXoeTY4s2cXh6WdbsGM/jMOCv7A8Y+NiZ0cvOqI2PK/acMjjrSyk5a YQLEhpR6WPjK8ko3FOVspP5E+Yl+A1AvPCayuMb/76jfHW+B5Zj/cH+ttoawbZzaPJ FuLAqku2pfv8f/xTYBStcBk7pGEqc+JeDlbGe10I=
X-Quarantine-ID: <64UBJ1Ym662b>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BFqQ30sfRz1nw8V; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <45882975-e4d1-045f-2556-d8defee22c91@lounge.org> <1BE15CF8-ECA3-48E7-BCEF-145EADF6D2EC@nohats.ca> <E1BD1EF8-E2A2-4057-86BB-AA080B506146@cisco.com> <e2e8fb86-2428-5bdc-3024-7e5970277847@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <456bf25a-81d0-3c33-b27a-7f25f162a767@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:20:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e2e8fb86-2428-5bdc-3024-7e5970277847@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZGaSTF3Xlgk3VaYKUsUrMIK_JVo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:20:14 -0000

Ohta-san, please stop.
 From where I sit, we are only discussing I-Ds and RFCs here.  Not works  
of literature.  And we are only discussing future I-Ds and RFCs.  The  
question of whether works of literature should  
/could/would/shouldn't/couldn't be rewritten is not relevant.

Yours,
Joel

On 7/27/2020 12:53 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
>> but the right response is
>> research results that demonstrate that the language needs to be
>> change,
> 
> destroying Thriller, the Lord of the Rings and all the fantasies
> and FRPGs in the future?
> 
> That's impossible.
> 
> Instead, you should accept that "black" is somewhat evil/bad
> though it does not imply black skin or cloths are evil/bad.
> 
> For example, though rather a fantasy than reality, Ninja is
> famous to have worn black cloths. So what?
> 
>                          Masataka Ohta
>