IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Sun, 02 August 2020 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6C93A0C96 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MlIAOiAHvVi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC53D3A0C94 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id g33so1397228pgb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eCfBPpykHiuXmAsV7ykPBBEC+YLoKLnOMuT10IH6aQQ=; b=gsxPWf1K3YtBVAqZrWwcxCfWgeHTTthvJTbC7e/Xjpcbpl4fZtxTUDFt3dJ7cKPJu8 jCkUmktfahGtBCZ4u5CyUsRn9JotYOZ1q2/bz0EKqLaBS58qtMQlGYw+VkKHn3RWXZME riVKFv22SDTDWDc5MO9oY0lWlTz54sF/4rlDnEJ5c83krgTb7DTmbGJgI6Kr3G0i5B01 mGHZPG7yJ6s7TVojKdF6w9kSTxcuV8c+iuqeNTy+cwuyj6O752U+1Z2+BTfXdv78/u9z q3hDZcHb/3XppKX2NolKd1y7PK50BZy3ESn88CafYxh+CBS5b9MR3N+sc2uORIt71p6g fFxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eCfBPpykHiuXmAsV7ykPBBEC+YLoKLnOMuT10IH6aQQ=; b=pTXeZFG58n10+pVhM7n0A/eW0PzRBWSRrf98baIApseN6w6FECuGq5Ha5zSf+aqu9t H464s9nF4V0W2S6ieRlJdy1B+IFa22XAViZ6bkbM9KyKfArRgBkcjAmsJrfFqYbfdOde l++joiruiWuZK6wsWaUZEizKYB2vZdaWjEiB3zOeEs1+SbPxOhVIxPl9KxdNbRmLCHTx SxfTGXrrX5TPe3c3fTOafnqEWkJzDdHxieZqbeGLonVOA4+4qXlWLtLbkaqqRtoUu/33 7ppD5A60T3gyfvopUq2vgkWF486aCxM69hFdykHrKA2rMw7jnrZ+8+FQ44fDlgbmKzsp V8oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jfiZchrmzW5WCzVglvBjg207WS9EUkmJLOoPZjewoMI40ff9+ q+PFCOaYJmiQSOSQ0T84V52CREuq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWKtKfbqeaAW6UDwVRPf02HaQCKpW7iBqPS6SZepegSJzdNGFAk9IoEwzmaFRk7kX1W8Xlaw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:37c6:: with SMTP id e189mr12896170pfa.207.1596404099859; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-73-54-rb1.jnu.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.73.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q66sm17221543pga.29.2020.08.02.14.34.58 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Aug 2020 14:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <5F272126.4040400@btconnect.com> <883BFFDE-A593-456A-B53B-1715AF377C2D@gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a2bf609c-d4ea-4b58-e260-e1ca4185b0e9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 13:34:57 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <883BFFDE-A593-456A-B53B-1715AF377C2D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H5VxQ6vlB1htUYgNz0DUB4pxIkI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:35:02 -0000

On 8/2/20 1:20 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> And for the record, this doesn’t originate in the IESG. It comes from HRPC.

It did not come from HRPC, in the sense that there was not, to
my recollection (which, granted, may be flawed), an RG decision
to request publication in the IETF stream.  It's "draft-knodel,"
not "draft-hrpc."

For the most part people seem to be arguing from their own
experiences and from what they believe to be true, rather than
addressing the actual contents of the draft.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@gmail.com

Software longa, hardware brevis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email