IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 23 July 2020 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1D23A0CD1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BzXCYTydGyBy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22523A0CCF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id f139so6191535wmf.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=otGqX1vnZtz/k+SLqQ7tzEQTeT+4n+8/WdzvbMR1W1g=; b=ZqB5YEnN2Wf4mORg6Nj0h+k71cBv+1+edNpv0m+bSek0GWXjBEawS0jdtVf4zDZ++P nZ4odKT3nRF+wY3c4/yB9hul9fEFnLkSH7lJkbcdKAmHjlAYyyNjuBmIXfdNnrsR3s9C pX7LHkbHy/EwyBJ79ZUUEy/mCConUhzv0AtEOaBjLOBmAuGTGbtqNbVZug5k7knSVKHj B3W3Ws24kPA6UbrFVyNnkWfR6g9EtzDjzGLS9TsoY7EhNvEb77Kh91z86Gx7t9FwSGJg ZNQvItNGIhXw+LW/nQtgi6efz2CqGGfIJxuPdf5vI2FMJNxKRlIPk2cTqRErlrg4fQ0U h0iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=otGqX1vnZtz/k+SLqQ7tzEQTeT+4n+8/WdzvbMR1W1g=; b=BukXFWXm8mbyyzgo+o4M7DkF4+KKJN96oFP2KfZf25OLI3C33YF2nzJUtEFpX0UixE QUtNR6qdTmcp7V3LlblTVeppXRwkO5DuvWyuzDZL/WZYaTH88/Bu9Pe1mXXoO4FkdvY7 ojL1G8Zx23O9yVbz2FsjJ3OiVlmkCLN686H+hpqUO4DtGC8bzWQoBlg5M+9fQdNxBr3g rAa4ztFK3TFpAgd0mMJ04JtUy3zJQvoXRxm/kHB6221uUw3HmX3PIeeW7GDwKuRZ1Dj5 H2RSkxTYg2XsaVf14gfAOwems9O7gBsvaK/r4Ecr+HthpgETsjguNyCVDYbE3QaZrOvp N61w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dcZ55HpNpqe7DJEgurIzMjlW/pePOyVIWv6xS3JxOEzjkGFpN uEg9ZQ1p5GEABSOS6ax1dwO78ik9Yo4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHfZUnp38bxu0VzF8cheGdcA01ocYeRK9/3Mp3S7mlvlfGG/V1mcDnlGvf1cCJ/r5rdBFl4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:218f:: with SMTP id e15mr5013604wme.63.1595531787913; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm4634741wrw.93.2020.07.23.12.16.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:15:56 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D208C070-48ED-4878-AB2E-4671C2AC649A@gmail.com>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MC3jKxTml0Os5K5WPnfK3URDSfA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:16:31 -0000

What approach should be used when the terms master/slave are used in third party specifications?

For example when referring to the IEEE 1588 Best Master Clock Algorithm?

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email