IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sun, 02 August 2020 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E773A0CCC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCLRgI9KCrIL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CAA03A0CB1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62665 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2020 21:17:10 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 2 Aug 2020 21:17:10 -0000
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <5F272126.4040400@btconnect.com> <883BFFDE-A593-456A-B53B-1715AF377C2D@gmail.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <0f0b80ac-cf3c-f7ad-a8c3-030d7f688908@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 06:35:07 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <883BFFDE-A593-456A-B53B-1715AF377C2D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n3QkJ7zen8qzwtEmm5EGg_2fie4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:35:12 -0000

Fred Baker wrote:

> And for the record, this doesn’t originate in the IESG. It comes from
> HRPC.

 From the charter:

	standards and protocols can enable, strengthen or threaten
	human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of
	Human Rights (UDHR) [1] and the Internaional Covenant on
	Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) [2], specifically, but
	not limited to the right to freedom of expression and
	the right to freedom of assembly.

it shouldn't have behaved so US centrically.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email