IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Fri, 24 July 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBAA3A0A41; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Db9GBV_SshN; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115193A0A2C; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F4D548068; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 9418A440043; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:39:13 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Message-ID: <20200724143913.GC10435@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <933ce8b4-78a5-76bf-55c3-7c5694faffbb@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <24325775-740E-469F-98C0-E9C8F8B9F169@akamai.com> <bc7197ab-78fd-bb86-6593-6ab948f5c5d3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bc7197ab-78fd-bb86-6593-6ab948f5c5d3@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rwqGH5WmF7m14ffsYyba0VxEcLs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:39:22 -0000

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:19:43PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> > The IETF was US-dominated
> 
> It was but isn't.

Check out what percentage of people in any role other than individual contributor
are neither US citizens, live in the US or do not draw money from a US company/organization.

If that iss not a good definition for IETF being a US-dominated organization, then please tell me yours.

Toerless

> 							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email