Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 29 July 2020 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EB33A09F8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCIbZxwwhg3M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D97783A0C99 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11524 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2020 11:58:51 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 29 Jul 2020 11:58:51 -0000
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: IETF Best Practices <ietf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <933ce8b4-78a5-76bf-55c3-7c5694faffbb@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <267BCA35-3A3F-440B-9F5F-2C818D5AE71A@icloud.com> <e7956fd8-2639-3df6-9539-0dd483cafa25@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <34CF64D6-10F3-4F45-B592-FA14C911DB0B@chopps.org> <c18fc227-7da0-1487-a2ae-74de1ac73759@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CALaySJ+UbSP5nJungBae053q7W_VQ-8yx2pr+KP6S+G81_1_VA@mail.gmail.com> <29896C76-F631-4E5A-9F42-CB9CEA08ABF8@gmail.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <a3c1f0dc-9432-685d-2005-43d1a1cef12c@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:17:04 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <29896C76-F631-4E5A-9F42-CB9CEA08ABF8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xO1jFG7hLRjJqlsagv6mkiUvPWw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:17:01 -0000

Stewart Bryant wrote:

> I would let authors express their thoughts as they think best, and
> leave the decision of what words to rephrase with the RFC Editors.

Never make the RFC editors the dictators.

The situation is already bad enough that employees of twitter
can not enjoy freedom of speech to say publicly that ban on
"blacklist" or "master/slave" is wrong without fear of losing
their job.

						Masataka Ohta