Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no> Wed, 29 July 2020 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <frodek@tele.no>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2B43A092F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tele.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eKxA3Lwa0kpm; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gorgon.tele.no (gorgon.tele.no [IPv6:2001:700:800::70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC0E3A0958; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 04:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tele.no; s=20180731; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mXIQYh4FUKr8SYtx0NB+Tiq59a1Un6PPpNDkQ1xLchI=; b=hSHADStqYPdkKvOZKdD/x9zaIN CZQWaUTcA3QHgjkZPJBhGkjEB0BEMhM4Ip3xQY+S8irjcZ/7JqINxT66nAwM62FJUTst5YWP/QclV vgNuxPRVYBb/2xuyLoMV6f62Zgq9C5AExkzf2YMITRU6+zhRQEmqg6ojNesem5YeA5KlhV+QH4SWf 2nw4Ffrz2azJj3VaL7tFWyplOZMH+gzgtPwYDhIcl+sx6N/TmtHaJsgWk0fbiYb5UrG9tFzhsKFwK J6okBGQbRq7kXpSbBbf1Zbm/MLFLXLmholp5oIZsxmrMhU2cqNVrssJHXavELxuo8TQ/JIrxC1Eg0 b0ecYv8A==;
Received: from pilt2.tele.no ([2001:700:800::21] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by gorgon.tele.no with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <frodek@tele.no>) id 1k0k9O-0004O3-6F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:21:34 +0200
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: IETF Best Practices <ietf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <933ce8b4-78a5-76bf-55c3-7c5694faffbb@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <267BCA35-3A3F-440B-9F5F-2C818D5AE71A@icloud.com> <e7956fd8-2639-3df6-9539-0dd483cafa25@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <34CF64D6-10F3-4F45-B592-FA14C911DB0B@chopps.org> <c18fc227-7da0-1487-a2ae-74de1ac73759@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CALaySJ+UbSP5nJungBae053q7W_VQ-8yx2pr+KP6S+G81_1_VA@mail.gmail.com> <fd61e3b0-ebe3-2c52-8db0-0b5e0428f6a9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no>
Message-ID: <aa3f0cf0-0052-37a7-2d2f-61a64842405c@tele.no>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:21:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fd61e3b0-ebe3-2c52-8db0-0b5e0428f6a9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gQdLWLm96cY6r1tUiLjyEc9IdSs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:21:58 -0000

Sorry, but I it's time to speak up.

On 29/07/2020 10:50, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> > - What would you want the IETF community to do with respect to the
> > Internet draft in question:
>
> Treat it as something written by noisy minority.

I strongly disagree. This is a real issue that needs to be addressed.

And this is definitively not only U.S.  centric, It's addressed in 
Norway and I guess many other "western countries" also. And the "white 
good/attractive" vs "dark  bad/attractive" is something that seems 
deeply rooted in Asian cultures also, both based on personal 
observation, media, avertismentss and others observers [1].

It's not up to you or me to define how others should interpret the "good 
intention" of the words we are using and instead MUST avoid using terms 
that don't need an explanation and cannot be misinterpreted.


Regards

Frode


{1] Some quick references

- White and Beautiful: An Examination of Skin Whitening Practices and 
Female Empowerment in China: 
https://onourterms.barnard.edu/article/white-and-beautiful/

. Where Does the Asian Obsession With White Skin Come From? 
https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/where-does-the-asian-obsession-with-white-skin-come-from/

- Brown and beautiful: the color-based beauty standards of Asian culture 
are grossly outdated 
https://www.highlandernews.org/36604/brown-and-beautiful-the-color-based-beauty-standards-of-asian-culture-are-grossly-outdated/