IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC abbreviations list

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Sat, 25 July 2020 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7D13A0B41 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtuKs1daC2uw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 15:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C35C3A0B40 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CD2548047; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 00:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 48D9B440043; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 00:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 00:15:07 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC abbreviations list
Message-ID: <20200725221507.GL43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <35BE966B-63A2-438F-BD61-570E86ED2E1A@strayalpha.com> <297BF899-553D-44DB-AB56-04280F776F7A@employees.org> <6646575A-E6EA-4B4E-AC1B-F8B84B5A1203@strayalpha.com> <20200724225654.GB43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <8F6D2B44-1914-4B3B-9458-3F2BF2CFCA05@tzi.org> <20200725210457.GJ43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9A6BE775-78B9-41C5-A3EE-A34C7D092CA0@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <9A6BE775-78B9-41C5-A3EE-A34C7D092CA0@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dDLe4EK0xrUGEha60j69but0wLQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 22:15:17 -0000

If we can put the most important new standards into RFC abbreviation list
even after i tell an AD twice, then i don't think we can deal with
new technical terms in the organization any better.

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:34:43PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-07-25, at 23:04, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > 
> > For exmple i have to observe a real bad execution on evolving the
> > RFC abbreviations list, and every time i pointed to problems,
> > they where not fixed, and ADs did not bother to pick up the problem.
> 
> True.  One of these ???medium importance??? issues???  Hard to get attention for them.
> 
> I think we need a calendar to attend to them once a year or so.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email