Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Mon, 10 August 2020 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659A3A13F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 22:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar3Kv55N_ZeG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 22:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic306-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic306-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.132.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F913A13F5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 22:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1597039164; bh=jwg5DyRagKdshhaOKEetVRvtpDCAdGU6uJCmblbEZPU=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=o5NAEcv2fKatlm88WU1r2LGagn2zdyClw4aEicVoEcERn1SEzICt8qMH0xIuX/Xh/6mh2JNDz3MEEY/B5SA1cOCrHMbzvsm3G+MdD5I4uSTcbyMKoYL7b7qA00eKiXEMSSk3UQFvL1MTtkS5TYEl+nPaXrcwVE6+XS/queF6oeK3mKfg8gXohZ2ELUcZBvx4H7QFcB+6n523YucMKRePLYMkJnZxccaxczo6ps9oRuKtW3HxKamhVgVPrMIPDtu5nVgrCXx7pjBR4kY5tLikquWrRMd8jcrl6zD3HfMw3tUtukCD9RHRRbf8HFLcN6WFlnDS43OLe6jsZ7w+Ca3oMA==
X-YMail-OSG: TZ.i7X8VM1loPYqBdbnY2W1PCJG33wZ4r9AdOsWiynr22cgiCjm06VRa6kS3HAl vjsTLH5ZcFXJQmJNXUrdRGCFgWV_afJoo2nEf5FJ9CaYgoebjzazzBztlpZ1sjBcgCL.p8lUo8Y. deyVGJzAJ5CJ3CXHEYXweAw5KK732RiLVJHgDmYY9sI5WYeLJGjWKxVBZ9AyLiaEZefRyeOz1EHt koZWyjE6bkrdZvlOtHLcrTpopegF9grkTaGMKacwWtigpDtqomBfu33Bf.q.KYgUk5u9BTvE77wm xg2KJxQ0pracXKy0w_c9a1RIGCBz2jVWvUWl.Exkr2P.1qBI_txC8wh1hUjlkSEkBvby7DeFT2ew 0_k9E5NbsCIuvlkJWvJvY4Dm6MFDfRlowu82RAm9P9Vgphc71PVusyVjN8GRG53916Qrmp1aEyoU HjqWy2.etoL39kh.7fiPH6IexFL97vxmuDrQxUxG32RpSmEF6Jww22GW1xmTMz0vqtugDVCTHkia XMX25LtnEpA.Np.ufnGbjlfzQEWSKjZR5Sn6MOkUhYWFi3S8CCEDiszc0lQh9lJMsmrtnhGt9iZv Il_ncUv7AjTgY64bDzwIE38oRTb5s6.yTz.17M.vaA7jYNhQmN3lEvJRfN3XEE0HDglgD3rk072_ j8PYowGrWfc1zhUr9VcldixpqRVD6jGQXipeUOnY4kxsR9d6ONu4iBV_6YcwKoxqcNpPzDh71T3C osPWfFOh1ZAMlWPFJLcBcsvnkzzUitxyHNRWWKjgoSNlxv_8eq9yif3oxobhUx_KtqXGAvceQOXO JtyioP26P0kc2lduv2zLXPyElRk1ye2XY49KceHMwVCZWV1aI966Kq2sQ2IaZN6o7ag2CkUVbtnK e9XpKnj5HE5J2lwYRVvkFR2G7pVzGDMwHXxItdR05O6ak7jXSOxFK6QxA8fmCW29HOV4C7pWKDrh AySjC3dwf2hDzbOEjmyw8N0lv5gbVk0uckosFQT9vzdxeDNCi.Z1T87DS.Lwx.55S_YNUrGZ_I7q 45Ed268aDQoZqqFiT55SIBup2kw2nHjI4jy1hrBZvxfhfxkL6SA3NjPkI4TC5PXmV8k5mLrddoCe tKmSrNZ9.R6z8RyjMdxJ2WNvLC2cWNHfbc78ihErlh5KsZrU4MixwJVE3Nk19MlZoxLkWSUBq0cx sUobZPbRSa_8QR7GbGnwBscaK...p9vP0H5ep6myiTNptBOg9qHJF9q1M3JMTd6K5IWetDfkcLYV 2dFYS5jfGngaRhJxvhy0csf0BmlswR3M9yhOapfFLnS4rfOdocGqjmAVqgd4JSrISdTsFV4FtC_C apPLse.Ov0a.J2iI1ycVDesSg9oBqssi8hInvTJRhp3kO0HXRV00lVr7nRR6HZNVRo65rACBY7t_ BgHbflj7T58jRy99HHCJr4_1S3SL5tX7_jfPcgeKV.LhDPYTFP_zGbJfZ0W5AxADgYQ--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:59:24 +0000
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:59:20 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1766599300.1713691.1597039160504@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <6a6b5336-e782-93a7-7a61-fd3d38e82111@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
References: <20200809175214.GA3100@localhost> <DEC952F4-379C-4C97-8772-DA6C556A3AF1@strayalpha.com> <6a6b5336-e782-93a7-7a61-fd3d38e82111@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1713690_29886362.1597039160503"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16436 YahooMailIosMobile Yahoo%20Mail/50518 CFNetwork/1128.0.1 Darwin/19.6.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KESMKgSqqByfUQJyMcckwhzypGY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:59:28 -0000

that's "dungeon playgroup chair", please.


Lloyd Woodlloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk

On Monday, August 10, 2020, 15:49, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:

Joe Touch wrote:

>>  Really, asserting that "master secret"
>> is problematic is simply credibility-destroying.
> 
> Besides your concern, how does one secret actively control another?

As most people in US do not mind to play TRPGs with dungeon/game
masters, who control the games, why do we have to bother?
> Or is it just that there is one root key from which others are derived?

"master secret" is used by many RFCs as terminology of TLS.

                            Masataka Ohta