Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 25 July 2020 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A33F3A0E74 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1-wM3a_rcnAl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C373A0E71 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06P0qpwj004533; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 01:52:51 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=sdqKo6ILCIqr7vOH+8tWpsjrifYsEIHhmMPy7hLeT+Q=; b=DiSWVv2R7MPmRb6x/LftPVPmW2JuTkrdJ2oRaLTb7IvjHf6Oo4MGKeYrKKpPQAQXRnts h4IoQ2QG83l5pBdQ7tYI6nm7WH6WoYrDhLjT4UaBedFGDrleYk5U1g9rPlFaU01Tyisi 9KrHdNu7Vh3KhsIRLrM+3hirTfKkQcPs657BPM/E4Y7j/N+ZlAWDQuYabJnoeVPO62R+ d3QRIcs4r8wg4Bq2/Y2v9UP4heBIhUeuLw29cEgp0jhoTy+jogWpvK2f2ALQnT8+0XlZ rH6Dq3HS4MT3XjcPqKcFbJVzGjoOcEr7Iqf07p2ovy5ZXykF1xx/3LwzEbWNSSGZo8M3 rg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32bs94fmf2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 25 Jul 2020 01:52:51 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06P0V0kx015983; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:52:48 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32dmj2t27k-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:52:48 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:52:44 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:52:44 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
CC: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Topic: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Index: AQHWYQ9qtd6kdf2qrEa/XteDIWlbrqkVzFAAgAB6ewCAABPPAIAAB+eAgAC8EoCAAElAgIAACOyAgAAEKYCAACd6AIAABykAgAAOogD//8eCgA==
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 00:52:43 +0000
Message-ID: <DC4B5029-DA11-4455-9499-68EF3AB71AA9@akamai.com>
References: <35BE966B-63A2-438F-BD61-570E86ED2E1A@strayalpha.com> <297BF899-553D-44DB-AB56-04280F776F7A@employees.org> <6646575A-E6EA-4B4E-AC1B-F8B84B5A1203@strayalpha.com> <20200724225654.GB43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CABmDk8=g=nqAGADGuUmL-GmLQQ-kOi5P2mjtbxVN+NhJwxe3mA@mail.gmail.com> <20200725001454.GE43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200725001454.GE43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.125]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FD9F42A9FFC6964B80F0C360D01784F9@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-24_10:2020-07-24, 2020-07-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007250000
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-24_10:2020-07-24, 2020-07-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007250003
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3S__fpZ4_8hItyhhuoBRnRrBNOk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 00:53:06 -0000

>    What specifically do you think we should do to have
    sufficient diversity for deciding on IETF document language evolution ?

We don't have to "solve" all the problems.  We should address known issues.  And then, when language changes, or another group comes up and says "this is hurtful/eclusionary" we should continue the process.

Based on your postings, I have come to the conclusion that you seem to think that, ideally, this is a one-time thing:  We fix a few words and then we're done.  I don't see it that way.  We start a process, and address those terms we know about.

>    What does it say about the self proclaimed inclusiveness goal of the
    IETF if it does imvolve 70% or more USA centric contributors ?

I don't know, but that's kind of a leading question. I'll answer similarly: if the first part of the process is done by mostly US contributors, that's could be okay because it is mostly US contributors that have used words we now want to avoid, and who seem to be in the most civil unrest over it. Put another way, "look those folks over there are getting rid of problematic terminology, maybe I can mention some words that hurt"  It is up to the privilege to provide a "safe space" for others.  I speak from experience on that.