rtcweb Discussion Archive - Date Index - Nov 2013

rtcweb Discussion Archive - Date Index - Nov 2013

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

Nov 30 2013

Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Roger Jørgensen
Re: [rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, cowwoc
[rtcweb] MTI motion JPEG, Ralph Giles

Nov 29 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Roberto Peon
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Ted Lemon
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)

Nov 28 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), SM
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), Bernard Aboba
[rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for the IETF (Was: Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives ), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Ted Lemon
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Michael Richardson
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Ted Lemon
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Dave Crocker
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Ted Lemon
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb, Eliot Lear
[rtcweb] Process discussion on the IETF general list, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Jeremy Fuller
[rtcweb] Final list of Video Codec Alternatives, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Leon Geyser
[rtcweb] Video codec selection: Dropping options, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, cowwoc

Nov 27 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Ted Hardie
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Jean-Marc Valin
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Engel Nyst
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Ted Hardie
[rtcweb] Adding additional text to to all options, Frode Kileng
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives - Timing, Mishra, Sanjay
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Paul Giralt
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives - Timing, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, Roman Shpount
Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Martin Thomson
[rtcweb] The Voting Process, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Derek Pang
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Mishra, Sanjay
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Thomas Reisinger
Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Magnus Westerlund
[rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Hrishikesh Kulkarni
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Derek Pang

Nov 26 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, Stephen Farrell
Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, Stephen Farrell
[rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Derek Pang
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Derek Pang
Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, Roman Shpount
Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Michael Tuexen
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Chenxin (Xin)
Re: [rtcweb] Trademarks in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05, Justin Uberti

Nov 25 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Trademarks in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Trademarks in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
[rtcweb] Trademarks in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] H.263 Baseline vs. H.261? (Was: H.263 licensing situation), Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, cowwoc
[rtcweb] H.263 Baseline vs. H.261? (Was: H.263 licensing situation), Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
[rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Alternatives 10 and 11: Merge?, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Stefan Håkansson LK
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Magnus Westerlund
[rtcweb] Fwd: RFC 7064 on URI Scheme for the Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
[rtcweb] Asymmetric codecs, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, Ron

Nov 24 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H.261, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Opinions are fine, bypassing a vote is not, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] IETF will fail to implement Video codec MTI after election? [was RE: Proposed Video Selection Process], Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] IETF will fail to implement Video codec MTI after election? [was RE: Proposed Video Selection Process], Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Florian Weimer
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Florian Weimer
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.264 CBP (was: Video codec selection - way forward), Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 - taking a longer view of things, Ron

Nov 23 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Opinions are fine, bypassing a vote is not (was: H.261), Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Opinions are fine, bypassing a vote is not (was: H.261), Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Marc Abrams
Re: [rtcweb] H.264 CBP (was: Video codec selection - way forward), Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, bryandonnovan
Re: [rtcweb] Opinions are fine, bypassing a vote is not (was: H.261), Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, cowwoc
[rtcweb] H.264 CBP (was: Video codec selection - way forward), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, cowwoc
[rtcweb] Opinions are fine, bypassing a vote is not (was: H.261), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
[rtcweb] Fwd: [rfc-dist] RFC 7065 on Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] IETF will fail to implement Video codec MTI after election? [was RE: Proposed Video Selection Process], Gregory Maxwell
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Steve Kann
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Martin Thomson
[rtcweb] IETF will fail to implement Video codec MTI after election? [was RE: Proposed Video Selection Process], Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Paul Giralt (pgiralt)
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Martin Thomson

Nov 22 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H.261, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Paul Giralt (pgiralt)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Basil Mohamed Gohar
[rtcweb] Fwd: [rfc-dist] RFC 7064 on URI Scheme for the Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
[rtcweb] Offer/answer for heterogeneous encode/decode, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Ashish V. Thapliyal
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Paul Giralt
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Consent alternative, tim panton
[rtcweb] Consent alternative, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Roman Shpount
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, bryandonnovan
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, bryandonnovan
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Steve Donovan
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Steve Donovan
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, bryandonnovan
Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for API mapping for RTP, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Steve Kann
Re: [rtcweb] H.261, Leon Geyser
[rtcweb] H.261, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for API mapping for RTP, Lijing (Jessie)
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cb.list6
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings

Nov 21 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Jack Moffitt
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
[rtcweb] cisco binary on ec2, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Matthew Kaufman
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Enrico Marocco
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Enrico Marocco
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] "pranswer" be applied as an update to a previously sent "answer"?, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Steve Kann
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Bossiel
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Dunkley
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Stefan Slivinski
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Dunkley
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Philipp Hancke
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Adam Roach
[rtcweb] Voting method choice (Re: Proposed Video Selection Process), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Dunkley
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] "pranswer" be applied as an update to a previously sent "answer"?, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Peter Dunkley
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
[rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] "pranswer" be applied as an update to a previously sent "answer"?, Christer Holmberg
Re: [rtcweb] "pranswer" be applied as an update to a previously sent "answer"?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Any update on OpenH264?, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Bossiel
[rtcweb] The answer for gilli, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
[rtcweb] VP8 / H.264 conversion without transcoding, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Any update on OpenH264?, Basil Mohamed Gohar
[rtcweb] Any update on OpenH264?, Gili

Nov 20 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Thomas Reisinger
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] RFC 6520 vs. draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Bernard Aboba
[rtcweb] "pranswer" be applied as an update to a previously sent "answer"?, Lijing (Jessie)
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Bernard Aboba

Nov 19 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Trellis IPR status? (Re: H261/MPEG-1 video quality), Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Trellis IPR status? (Re: H261/MPEG-1 video quality), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Trellis IPR status? (Re: H261/MPEG-1 video quality), Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] PM-DIR review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
[rtcweb] Trellis IPR status? (Re: H261/MPEG-1 video quality), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Varun Singh
[rtcweb] RTCWeb-it2 results, Robert Sparks
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, David Singer

Nov 18 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Reference implementation of software codecs, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Reference implementation of software codecs (was: Video codec selection - way forward), cowwoc
[rtcweb] Reference implementation of software codecs (was: Video codec selection - way forward), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
[rtcweb] PM-DIR review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
[rtcweb] H.263 licensing situation, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Matt Fredrickson
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Thomas Reisinger
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Ross Finlayson
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Thomas Reisinger
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Chenxin (Xin)
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc

Nov 17 2013

Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Varun Singh
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Thomas Reisinger
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Toerless Eckert
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Toerless Eckert
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Adam Roach

Nov 16 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Gunnar Hellstrom
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Justin Uberti

Nov 15 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Basil Mohamed Gohar
[rtcweb] Turn Revised And Modernized (tram), Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Kaiduan Xie
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Eggert, Lars
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Eggert, Lars
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Marco Stura
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Stephan Wenger

Nov 14 2013

Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Ron
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Gorry Fairhurst
Re: [rtcweb] where that h264 plugin can be used, Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Subha Dhesikan (sdhesika)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Gili
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Göran Eriksson AP
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Wesley Eddy
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Gili
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Jonathan Rosenberg
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, James Polk
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Ted Hardie
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Wesley Eddy
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Jonathan Rosenberg
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Jeremy Fuller
[rtcweb] H261/MPEG-1 video quality (was: I'd love it if patents evaporated), Maik Merten
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Philipp Hancke
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Philipp Hancke
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gustavo Garcia
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Robin Raymond
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cb.list6
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Jonathan Rosenberg
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Chris Wendt
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Ron
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Erik Lagerway
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Göran Eriksson AP
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Silvia Pfeiffer

Nov 13 2013

Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Michael Thornburgh
Re: [rtcweb] opportunity cost (was MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, James Polk
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Kaiduan Xie
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Paul Giralt
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Ron
[rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward, Gonzalo Camarillo
[rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Paul Giralt
[rtcweb] Usefulness of ICE-TCP (Was: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01), Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Ravindran, Parthasarathi (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
Re: [rtcweb] where that h264 plugin can be used, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", John Leslie
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Ravindran, Parthasarathi (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Iñaki Baz Castillo
Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Lorenzo Miniero
[rtcweb] where that h264 plugin can be used, Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", David Singer

Nov 12 2013

Re: [rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Basil Mohamed Gohar
[rtcweb] ~"I'd love it if patents evaporated...If not now, when", Mike Linksvayer
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Ravindran, Parthasarathi (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
Re: [rtcweb] Registration for the second SIP Forum RTCWeb interop test event is open, Robert Sparks
[rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-00, Magnus Westerlund
[rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund
[rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Iñaki Baz Castillo
Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Christer Holmberg

Nov 11 2013

Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Lorenzo Miniero
[rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer, Iñaki Baz Castillo
[rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for API mapping for RTP, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, David Singer

Nov 10 2013

Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for API mapping for RTP, Stefan Håkansson LK
Re: [rtcweb] External Review Team, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Who is committed to supporting MTI? (was Re: MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Ron
Re: [rtcweb] External Review Team, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] External Review Team, David Singer

Nov 09 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Who is committed to supporting MTI? (was Re: MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Who is committed to supporting MTI? (was Re: MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Peter Thatcher
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Lorenzo Miniero
[rtcweb] Who is committed to supporting MTI? (was Re: MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929), Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] On the form of the question (was Re: Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs), Ron
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Peter Thatcher

Nov 08 2013

Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Peter Thatcher
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, cb.list6
Re: [rtcweb] On demand & Internet TV via rtcweb? (was: Current H.264...), David Benham
Re: [rtcweb] On demand & Internet TV via rtcweb? (was: Current H.264...), tim panton
[rtcweb] On demand & Internet TV via rtcweb? (was: Current H.264...), David Benham
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] External Review Team, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] On the form of the question (was Re: Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs), Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] External Review Team, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, cb.list6
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Current H.264 licensing practice, Tim Panton new
Re: [rtcweb] Current H.264 licensing practice, David Benham
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, Tim Panton
[rtcweb] On the form of the question (was Re: Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs), Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI (was: Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs), Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Martin J. Dürst
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Current H.264 licensing practice, Florian Weimer
Re: [rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, cowwoc
[rtcweb] H.261 vs No MTI (was: Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs), cowwoc
[rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
[rtcweb] MTI video codec, charter, RFC 3929, Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs, Gregory Maxwell
Re: [rtcweb] WebVC licensing issues (Re: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] WebVC licensing issues (Re: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] WebVC licensing issues (Re: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
[rtcweb] WebVC licensing issues (Re: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Harald Alvestrand
[rtcweb] Alternative consensus and MTI video codecs, Gregory Maxwell
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, David Singer

Nov 07 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Current H.264 licensing practice, David Benham
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Krasimir Kolarov
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Krasimir Kolarov
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
[rtcweb] Current H.264 licensing practice, Florian Weimer
[rtcweb] Proposal for API mapping for RTP, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Stefan Håkansson LK
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bo Burman
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Toshio Kuratomi
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Max Jonas Werner
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Gregory Maxwell
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck

Nov 06 2013

Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Colin Perkins
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Monty Montgomery
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Ted Hardie
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Suhas Nandakumar
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Dan Burnett
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Toshio Kuratomi
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
[rtcweb] One consuming project's concerns with OpenH264 as a MTI codec, Toshio Kuratomi
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Michael Procter
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mohammed Raad
[rtcweb] Adhoc meeting on RTP to API Mapping, Magnus Westerlund
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Max Jonas Werner
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, bryandonnovan
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Markus.Isomaki
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Gustavo Garcia

Nov 05 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Dave Taht
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Karl Stahl
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mohammed Raad
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Max Jonas Werner
Re: [rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
[rtcweb] usability of IdP concepts in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07, Wolfgang Beck
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Martin Thomson
[rtcweb] Making both VP8 and H264 MTI, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Kristian Kielhofner
[rtcweb] OS Codec APIs, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
[rtcweb] Notes from the IETF88 Monday RTCWEB session, Ralph Giles
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Tony Hansen
Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement, Bernard Aboba
[rtcweb] #33: Section 5.5: SRTP/SDES guidance, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extensions, rtcweb issue tracker
[rtcweb] a=sendrecv, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] #19: Section 7.2: Congestion Control Extensions, rtcweb issue tracker

Nov 04 2013

Re: [rtcweb] #2: Section 7.1, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] #22: Section 4.3: Negotiation requirement, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] #23: Section 4.4 SDP signaling requirement, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] #30: Wiretapping, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] #24: Section 17.1 Normative reference to draft-westerlund-avtcore-transport-multiplexing, rtcweb issue tracker
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Richard Shockey
Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Randell Jesup
[rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Bernard Aboba
[rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Liaison Statement to IETF (SC 29 N 13820), Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Ralph Giles
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Basil Mohamed Gohar
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Parthasarathi R
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Erik Lagerway
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Hutton, Andrew
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Richard Shockey
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Tim Panton
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Jonathan Rosenberg
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] FW: Liaison Statement to IETF (SC 29 N 13820), Krasimir Kolarov
[rtcweb] FW: Liaison Statement to IETF (SC 29 N 13820), Stephan Wenger
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, David Singer
Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - common attributes, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Provisional answers in JSEP draft, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Platforms that support H264), Randell Jesup
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Randell Jesup

Nov 03 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
[rtcweb] Provisional answers in JSEP draft, Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
Re: [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Platforms that support H264), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
[rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Platforms that support H264), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), tim panton

Nov 02 2013

Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Kaiduan Xie
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Bossiel thioriguel
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), tim panton
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Martin Thomson
[rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), cowwoc
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Eric Rescorla
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Ron
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Karl Stahl
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bernard Aboba
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Alessandro Amirante
[rtcweb] R: Re: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Simon Pietro Romano
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Silvia Pfeiffer
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Leon Geyser
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Harald Alvestrand

Nov 01 2013

Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Subsequent Offers, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - Recycling m-lines, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05 - common attributes, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Justin Uberti
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Doug Geistkemper
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Adam Roach
Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Timothy B. Terriberry
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Richard Barnes
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Lorenzo Miniero
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Olle E. Johansson
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Richard Barnes
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Martin Thomson
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Richard Barnes
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Olle E. Johansson
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Max Jonas Werner
Re: [rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), cowwoc
[rtcweb] x264 vs OpenH264 (Was: On the topic of MTI video codecs), Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Chris Wendt
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Emil Ivov
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Simon Perreault
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, cowwoc

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]